Work Smarter, Not Harder

Kareo April 8th, 2013

Leave a Comment Latest by COMMENTOR NAME

By Thom Schildmeyer, President, Aesyntix Health, Inc.

Over the last three months, we have had a significant increase in providers asking about cash flow. Specifically, they want to know whether or not they should open up their practice to more payers and/or seek alternative revenues sources. The complaint is the same: “I am working hard, but my income continues to go down.”

Oftentimes, the “knee-jerk” reaction is to aggressively try to attract and treat more patients, thinking higher volume alone will result in more money. Yet, there are considerable expenses associated with this strategy that can reduce profitability, from marketing and advertising to the actual cost of service.

In fact, many providers who travel down this path find themselves working harder and longer hours, only to increase levels of stress with marginal benefit to their bottom line. I recommend something different.

Focus on Your Outstanding A/R
Fortunately, there’s a much easier way to increase your revenue without expending additional resources. And it’s right there in front of you: your outstanding accounts receivable (A/R).

For example, take a practice that on average posts $50,000 in clinical charges each month. It’s not uncommon for this practice to have an outstanding A/R balance of 1.5 times that amount, or roughly $75,000, carried over each month. An average contractual adjustment rate of 25 percent* results in approximately $56,250 that the practice has earned and is legally owed, but has not yet collected. (* this rate varies based on a number of factors)

Can they afford to walk away from this money, leaving well-deserved revenue on the table? For most practices, including this one, the answer is no. But where do they start? The first step is to assess whether their billing staff has the capacity and expertise to focus on A/R collections. If so, simply redirecting them with a sense of urgency to improve performance can yield significant results. This practice does have the resources and did look to redirect.

Work Your Unpaid Claims
When assessing your outstanding A/R, look first at your unpaid insurance claims. Collecting on a higher number of claims sooner than later will result in immediate revenue for your practice. Below are a few best practices I suggested to this practice to help facilitate smoother claims submission and, most important, faster payment:

  • Identify patterns with insurance carriers: When working to resolve unpaid claims, it’s important to find a pattern relative to each insurance carrier. If you are able to discover a common factor, you can modify your billing style to avoid future denials.
  • Review claims before resubmitting: Make the most of the information you have before spending time to gather more, by addressing the following items:
    – Ensure that proper contractual adjustments are made to each line item.
    – Verify that CPT and ICD-9 codes are for covered services.
    – Check modifiers; remember global periods, unrelated procedures on the same date of service, and separately identifiable evaluation/management services.
    – Review insurance authorization and physician referral requirements to determine if an authorization is (or needs to be) in place.
    – Determine if the bill should be moved to a secondary insurance or the patient.
  • Create a strategy for easy “wins”: If all information appears correct and claims still require follow-up, prioritize your unpaid claim list to pursue the “low-hanging fruit” first. Considering the age of the claim and outstanding dollar amount to prioritize your list is a common way to increase your collections success rate.

A less applied, but perhaps even more valuable technique is to look closely at your payer mix, identifying those that are easiest to work with and have faster turnaround times. Are you required to complete an online form, mail a letter, or make a phone call? If “Carrier A” processes claims in 10 days and “Carrier B” processes in 28 days, where should you start?

Combining these principles with your existing A/R process can help resolve more claims in a shorter amount of time. Furthermore, receiving the outstanding funds quicker can make the average amount per claim less relevant to your overall strategy. And ultimately, this is one step towards working smarter, not harder, to increase your bottom line.

About the Author

Thom Schildmeyer shares tips to solve real world medical billing problems

Thom Schildmeyer is President of Aesyntix Health, Inc, a leading provider of billing and purchasing solutions for dermatologists and cosmetic surgeons. He has more than 20 years experience consulting with practices in the areas of financial analysis, practice valuation, human resources, training and development, sales management, marketing, and patient relations.

Read More

You Can Reduce Denials, Part 2

Kareo February 5th, 2013

Leave a Comment Latest by COMMENTOR NAME

Last week in You Can Reduce Denials, Part 1, we reviewed strategies for reducing the number of denied claims by improving processes at your practice. Reducing errors during appointment scheduling and check-in and while coding can eliminate many denied claims. However, you will still have some claims that get denied. It could be for medical necessity or other billing issues not related to an error. When this happens, you want to be prepared to appeal. According to Elizabeth Woodcock, 75% of appeals result in denials being overturned – and paid.

In her webinar on Effective Appeals in Medical Billing: Breaking Through the Barricade to Get Paid, she reviewed how you should prepare for your claims appeals.

  1. The Patient Has the Authority: When you appeal a claim, you are appealing on behalf of the patient and not the physician or provider. As the provider or medical biller, you are not authorized to appeal an adverse benefit determination without a signed authorization from the patient. An Assignment of Benefit form is not sufficient authorization, as it only authorizes the claimant to receive payment from the payer on the patient’s behalf.
  2. Gather Evidence: When you are filing a claim appeal, you should be as prepared as a lawyer going to trial. The insurance company or payer that denied your claim should have already disclosed to you the nature of the adverse benefit determination. That communication should clearly state the reason that you were denied payment or not paid in full, including the following information:
    - Reason(s) for the denial
    - References to the plan provision on which the denial is based
    - A description of the information/documentation required to appeal the claim
    - Procedures for appealing a decision.
    You may request additional documentation, including copies of the patient’s benefit manual or any specific plan rules, rate tables, fee schedules and criteria used to ensure that the plan rules were consistently applied to your claim. The payer may also hire medical, occupational or other experts to obtain specific knowledge regarding conditions of your claim. The payer is not required to disclose the identity of these experts, but must provide that information when requested by the claimant.
  3. Prepare and File Your Appeal: By comparing the documentation provided to you by the payer with the documentation you already have regarding the patient, including chart notes, you should be able to determine where the problem lies. Draft a strong appeal letter summarizing all relevant information regarding the claim in question. Stick to the basics, avoiding any information that is not essential to the claim. File your appeal in a timely manner, and make note of the date in a file you create specifically for this claim. Follow up regularly and try to speak with the same people whenever you contact the company. With documentation and diligence, your adverse benefit determination can be overturned and the bill paid.

For more appealing denied claims, check out Elizabeth’s webinar, Effective Appeals in Medical Billing: Breaking Through the Barricade to Get Paid.

Read More

You Can Reduce Denials, Part 1

Kareo January 31st, 2013

Leave a Comment Latest by COMMENTOR NAME

Denials can happen for lots of reasons, and they can eat up staff time, but they have to be dealt with. This is money you are owed for services that you have provided. So, we’re going to spend some time talking about medical billing strategies to prevent denials and things you can do to resolve them when they happen.

First, your practice needs to set some standards, or benchmarks, for denials. What are you willing to write off? Most experts say it shouldn’t be more than 4%. So, if that is your goal – not to write off more than 4% in denials – you’ll need to set up some processes to make that happen.

First, monitor your claims submissions. With electronic claims, this is easier than ever. Check claims submission reports regularly. This will show you which claims are accepted and which are not. You may get two reports—one for the clearinghouse and one from the payer. If that is the case, be sure to review both as soon as you get them. The reports will show you the denied claims and the reason for the denial. Hopefully, it is an easy fix and you can correct it and resubmit.

According to the Medical Group Management Association about 5% of claims get denied, and it is usually due to small mistakes made when scheduling appointments or at check in. So the next step in reducing denials is making sure you have good processes in place at the front desk to reduce errors. This includes verifying patient contact and insurance information. No matter how busy the front desk may be they should always verify patient information, preferably by showing the patient their information and having them visually check it. Verifying eligibility ahead of time is another way to ensure you have accurate patient information and that the patient is covered for services. Most practice management software offer some kind of eligibility verification feature now. If you aren’t using it, you should be. It’s an easy way to avoid denials—and a great way to help you collect co-pays up front!

The second most common cause of denials is inaccurate coding. Physicians make mistakes. The coding process is complicated and it is easy to make a mistake and put the wrong diagnosis code. Use mistakes as an opportunity to educate the provider about what happened so they don’t make the same mistake again. This is an area where electronic health records can be a big help. Many providers find that coding accuracy improves with an EHR.

Tracking denials can also help you reduce them. As you see patterns or problems, you can work to correct them at the source. Hopefully, over time you can reduce your overall denials so staff are spending less and less time on correcting and reprocessing claims. With the trend towards increasing patient due amounts, they will need that time to do other follow up!

Read More

The Top 12 Medical Billing Tips of 2012

Kareo January 7th, 2013

Leave a Comment Latest by COMMENTOR NAME

As we head into 2013, let’s not forget about some of the great tools, tips, and tricks, we learned from a few the industry experts who shared their knowledge about medical billing with us through blog posts and webinars in 2012. Here are some of our top picks from each month in 2012!

January: Surviving the Deductible Reset in 2012
At the beginning of each calendar year, medical groups feel the impact of deductibles on their bottom line unless they implement “best practices” for self-pay collections. Read More

February: The Importance of Documentation for Medicare and Medicaid Claim
Dr. Julie Taitsman, Chief Medical Officer for the Office of Inspector General, gave a presentation recently as a part of the OIG’s award-winning HealthCare Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (HEAT) on the importance of documentation for Medicare and Medicaid claims. Read More

March: The PQRS Incentive Program: How to Qualify, Get Started and Get Paid
The Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) is a federally mandated, voluntary program implemented by CMS. PQRS provides incentive payments to providers who satisfactorily meet specific quality measures. Read More

April: Understanding RVUs: Ensure Accurate Reimbursement for the E/M Services You Provide
When was the last time you took a closer look at the Relative Value Units (RVUs) associated with the evaluation and management (E/M) services you provide? Read More

May: Hidden Ways Medical Billing Shortcomings Hurt Your Practice
When a practice’s medical billing staff or service fails to accurately claim all the revenue the practice has earned – for example, by under-coding to ‘save time’ or neglecting to use important modifiers – this naturally represents an immediate loss of revenue. Read More

June: 7 Simple Ways to Improve Your Medical Billing Appeals Process
Spending the time and resources to appeal denied claims is crucial for any physician practice. Not only can appeals potentially help physicians recoup money, but they can also divert auditors from honing in on problematic claims. Read More

July: Hidden in Plain Sight: Five Medical Coding Gems from Your CPT Book
A spy in a novel I was reading said the best place to hide was in plain sight. I’ve never traveled incognito, so I don’t know if that’s true. But, I do know that the answers to many of my medical coding questions are an arms’ length away from me, hidden in plain sight in my CPT book. Here are five of my discoveries. Read More

August: Take a Closer Look at Your Superbill to Ensure Accurate Billing
Superbills aren’t necessarily supposed include every code a physician might report. The superbill is typically a one-page reference of the most common codes used in a particular practice. Still, practices should take the time to review their superbills and any relevant coding/billing policies to look for deficiencies that could affect their bottom line. Read More

September: Seven Ways to Improve Your Patient Collections
It’s not front-page news: patients have higher deductibles and out of pocket costs, shifting the burden in medical practices from insurance to patient due collections. Read More

October: Is Your Medical Practice Disaster Plan Ready?
Are you ready for a disaster? The best time to create a medical practice disaster plan is long before the disaster hits. If you don’t have a plan, consider putting these five best practices in place before it’s too late. Read More

November: Increase Your Revenue Tip: Prescription Refills
Prescribing is a big deal for practices. Many report the greatest percentage of in-bound phone calls to their practices are prescription related. Either the patient is asking for prescription refills or pharmacy personnel are seeking approval to fill a script. Have you ever considered how much this process is costing your practice? Have you ever asked, “How can we be compensated for this time?” Read More

December: 9 Essentials for an Effective Year End (and year to come)
Closing out the year is about more than just running reports and handing data to your accountant. It’s the time when you can evaluate the year, analyze whether you have achieved your practice goals, set new goals for the coming year, and look at new opportunities.  Read More

Read More

Use Your Medical Billing Software to Analyze Your Performance, Part 3

Kareo January 2nd, 2013

Leave a Comment Latest by COMMENTOR NAME

After all of your hard work, it’s finally time to use the data you pulled from your medical billing software and the analysis you’ve done on your data to identify opportunities and action items to improve your bottom line. Here is a quick summary of 8 things to consider based on the results of your analysis.

  1. If you found that your no-show and/or cancellation rates were high, then set a goal to reduce that. Some strategies to consider are phone and email reminders and a cancellation/no-show policy that includes a fee. Read more about this in our blog post 3 Easy Ways to Minimize the Impact of Cancellation on Your Practice.
  2. If you’re providers aren’t seeing as many patients as they could. Set a goal to maximize your providers’ time and the number of patients seen by improving your scheduling and your patient flow. For ideas on scheduling, see the blog post Use Your Schedule to Make Money.
  3. If unbilled and lost charges are a problem for your practice start employing simple “self-audits”. Evaluate your overall billing process and document how you expect your staff to handle every step. There are lots of publications and forms available online that you can use to jumpstart this documentation. Remember to tailor it to your specific needs and be realistic based on your staffing.
  4. If you found that you are missing patient payments, it may be time to implement some strategies to improve patient collections. For more on creating a financial policy and other ways to improve patient collections, see our blog post 7 Ways to Improve Patient Collections. Most importantly, get paid when the patient is in the office. The minute they walk out the door your chance of collecting drops significantly. And offer them options like online billpay. Everything you can do to make it easier for them to pay their bill will help you collect.
  5. Bad debt will always be an issue to some degree, but you can reduce it by being more proactive in adjusting your policies and processes when specific issues are identified.
  6. The reality in a medical practice today is that you will never have enough staff to do all your collections.  The key is giving staff a fighting chance to recover as much as possible and focus their time where it does the most good. The top way to do this? Automate as many tasks as possible with a good practice management system. By providing appointments reminders, authorizing services before they are rendered, scrubbing claims, and processing claims electronically, you immediately eliminate a number of possible problems. This enables your billing staff to focus on correcting other problems and following up on denials and patient collections.
  7. You should always know your payer mix and its impact to your practice. Do not be afraid to renegotiate or even walk away from a contract if it is hurting your practice. You want to look for ways to maximize seeing patients from your more favorable contracts, but you can only do this if you know your payer mix!
  8. If you are struggling with timely filing and/or high denails don’t just focus all your efforts on correcting the problem after the fact. Focus on fixing the source of the problem. Again, arming your staff with the best tools will make a huge difference. For more on how to minimize denials, check out our blog post Stop Denials in Thier Tracks.

You’re not going to be able to tackle everything issue at once. you need to take what you know and identify your biggest challenges. Prioritize the problems that have the most impact and set goals to address those issues. Use some of the suggestions and tool swe’ve offered in this series and stayed tuned for more practice management tools and tips in 2013.

Read More

Increase Your Medical Coding Accuracy in These Five Crucial Areas

Betsy Nicoletti, M.S., CPC September 25th, 2012

Leave a Comment Latest by COMMENTOR NAME

Increase your coding accuracy in these five crucial areas to improve your revenue

Ask a physician or biller or office manager: Do you want to submit claims with accurate coding or inaccurate coding?  Of course, the goal is to accurately report services performed by selecting the CPT and ICD-9 codes that describe what was done.  Medical practices don’t intend to code inaccurately or incorrectly. And yet, the latest Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) report conducted by a Medicare contractor shows a 12.9% error rate for physician services.  Before giving in to despair, increase your medical coding accuracy in these five key areas:

1.      Review three high error codes

Performing an E/M audit on all clinicians is a daunting task, and may require an outside auditor.  Instead of a complete audit, review three office codes with a high error rate.  The CERT report found a 24% error rate for 99205, 20.8% error rate for 99204 and an 18.6% error rate for 99215.  Run a frequency report for each clinician, and select records to review coded with these three codes.  If your office doe not have an experienced auditor, have a biller/clinician team review the notes using an audit sheet.  Educate clinicians who are billing these codes if they are missing required components.

2.      Seek out cloning

Only Dolly the sheep should be cloned, not medical records.  We can paraphrase the Supreme Court here in defining cloning, “I know it when I see it.”  The Office of Inspector General calls these identical E/M notes, and these identical notes are an area of interest on their current Work Plan.  Identical or cloned notes consist of notes in which some or all of the note is copied from a previous note/visit or when all of the notes are so similar to one another that they appear identical. 

 It is easy to determine if notes in your practice give this appearance.  Select two patients who have been seen three or more times in the past year.  Review three of the notes.  Although the past medical, family and social history may be identical from one note to another, and the exam similar, the history of the present illness should reflect what the patient said at that visit, or the status of their problems since the last visit. The assessment and plan should describe what happened at this visit and should not be identical to the previous note.  Use this same strategy to look at visits scheduled for the same condition on different patients. Do all patients with the presenting problem of frequency have the exact same documentation?

3.      Replace non-specific diagnosis codes

Non-specific diagnosis codes can cause claim denials and require appeals.  Using non-specific codes will also make the change to ICD-10 more difficult.  Run a diagnosis frequency report of your 50 most common diagnosis codes.  Look for non-specific codes, which often end in .8 or .9.  Each week, select five non-specific codes and provide clinicians with more specific codes and education about using them.

4.      Use correct NPI numbers

It is both a mistake and a compliance error to bill all services provided by a Non-Physician Practitioner (NPP) to Medicare using the physician’s National Provider Identifier (NPI) number.  For Medicare, the services must meet incident to guidelines. Many state Medicaid programs require practices to bill NPP services using their own, not the physician’s NPI.  Commercial insurers may or may not enroll and credential NPPs.  If the commercial payer does not, then submit the claim under the physician’s NPI.  Check first.  Do not bill for new clinicians under another clinician’s NPI while waiting for enrollment.  Accurately reflect the NPI number of the performing clinician according to Medicare and Medicaid rules and payer contracts.

5.      Modifier 25 and E/M services

The final report to run to increase accurate coding is one that shows how often your group bills an E/M service with a procedure.  It should not be 100% of the time.  Report both an E/M service and a procedure, appending modifier 25 to the E/M, when the office service was a distinct and separate service and is clearly documented.  This is most likely in one of two instances:  There were two separate problems, or the evaluation of the problem was extensive.  Do not report an E/M service for a planned procedure or for a minor procedure that required only evaluation of the site and the decision to perform the service (wart destruction, for example).  If the documentation reads, “Patient presents today for a LEEP because of an abnormal pap smear,” bill only for the LEEP. 

 Medical practices can decrease coding errors.  Focus attention on these five areas and experience a high return on your time investment.

 Betsy Nicoletti, M.S., CPC, is the founder of Codapedia.com, a wiki for physician reimbursement. She is a nationally known speaker and consultant, and can be reached at www.mpconsulting.org. She recently wrote for Getting Paid on Seven Ways to Improve Your Patient Collections.

Read More

Know How Unspecified ICD-9-CM Diagnosis Codes Could Hurt Your Practice’s Bottom Line

Lisa Eramo September 13th, 2012

1 Comment Latest by COMMENTOR NAME

Unspecified diagnosis codes don’t provide any definitive information to payers, some of which will look for any reason to deny the medical necessity of services that physicians render

Although ICD-9-CM includes unspecified codes, practices should avoid reporting them, when possible.

Why?

They don’t provide any definitive information to payers, some of which will look for any reason to deny the medical necessity of services that physicians render, says Betty Johnson, CPC, CPC-I, CPMA, CPC-H, CPC-D, director of ICD-10 development and training at the American Academy of Professional Coders in Salt Lake City.

Unspecified codes—when reported frequently—can definitely subject physicians to third-party audits, says Johnson. Physicians can easily get into trouble when they report level 4 or 5 E/M codes with unspecified ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes, for example. This is problematic because payers may assume that the patient’s vague and unspecified diagnosis doesn’t justify the medical necessity of the intense level of E/M provided. It’s also easy for payers to assume that if the diagnosis isn’t documented properly, then the E/M level might not be documented appropriately either, she adds. 

Aside from the potential financial ramifications, unspecified diagnosis codes also prohibit effective disease management and other research efforts, says Johnson. 

It will become even more important to avoid unspecified codes once ICD-10 takes effect in 2014. That’s because ICD-10 includes more granular codes, and payers will likely question physicians who aren’t taking advantage of this added specificity, says Johnson.

For example, although ICD-10-CM does provide an unspecified option for otitis media (H66.90, otitis media, unspecified, unspecified ear), this code is so non-specific that it will most certainly raise a payer’s red flag, says Johnson. Instead, physicians should document laterality (i.e., whether the ear infection is in the left or right ear), which is not currently required in ICD-9-CM. Simply stating ear infection won’t be sufficient.  

Likewise, ICD-10-CM does provide an unspecified option for asthma (J45.90-, unspecified asthma); however, physicians should avoid this code. Instead, they should document whether the asthma is mild, moderate, or severe as well as whether it’s intermittent or persistent. This will enable coders to report a more specified option, says Johnson.  

Looking ahead

It’s too soon to tell how unspecified codes may affect physician reimbursement in 2014 and beyond because ICD-10-CM is vastly different than all of the other code sets that precede it, says Johnson. Even today, physicians are very dependent on each payer’s policy. Some payers may shift payment patterns for unspecified codes much more drastically than others. Some may deny claims entirely while others may require more documentation.  

The good news is that physicians don’t necessarily need to document paragraphs of additional information. One or two terms (e.g., acute or chronic) can make a big difference in terms of coders being able to report a more specified code, says Johnson.  

Johnson says that ICD-10 may eventually help with the adjudication process and reduce the number of denials that physicians receive simply because codes are more specific, and they tell the patient’s story more effectively.  

What you can do now

Talk with your larger payers. Ask your payers whether they’re looking more closely at unspecified codes. If not, does the payer plan to do so in the future once ICD-10 takes effect? 

Re-evaluate your templates. Can your EMR vendor make your templates more specific? Is there a user group that you can join to connect with other physician practices and better understand what your vendor might be doing to prepare for ICD-10? 

Ensure that coders have access to medical records when coding. Some physicians may document a more specific diagnosis in the record but not on the encounter form. If coders don’t have access to the records, they must default to an unspecified code in these instances, says Johnson.

Lisa A. Eramo is a freelance writer and editor specializing in medical coding, health information management, and other healthcare regulatory topics. Visit her website at http://lisaeramo.wordpress.com/. Lisa wrote recently for Getting Paid on How Will Your Practice Transition Its Superbill to ICD-10?, Take a Closer Look at Your Superbill to Ensure Accurate Billing and Prevent Denials with More Accurate Medical Coding. Lisa has also written on Understanding RVUs: Ensure Accurate Reimbursement for the E/M Services You Provide.

Read More

Medical Billing Tip of the Month – September

Kareo September 10th, 2012

Leave a Comment Latest by COMMENTOR NAME

Our judges (you) have spoken, and we have our Medical Billing Tip of the Month. We received a terrific volume of votes! Thank you to everyone who voted on our blog and Facebook. The winner of our Medical Billing Tip of the Month contest this month is…

Control the Top 10 Internal & External Denials Using the Denial Summary Report

We are using the Denial summary report to control the internal and external denials in our providers’ practices

Go to Reports > Payments > Denial Summary > Change the date to “Year to date.”

By generating the report, you can view the claims denied with the denial code and the total amount. Just generate the report into an Excel spreadsheet and sort the denials in descending order by total amount. You can also drill down to the billed amount to review the CPT and the carrier for a particular denial code. Then categorize whether the denial is internal or external. Here is the report for reference:

Our September Medical Billing Tip of the Month features advice on how to manage your denials

For example: Co-22 – Payment adjusted because this care may be covered by another payer per coordination of benefits.

Ex: C0-26 – Expenses incurred prior to coverage.

Ex: Co-27 – Expenses incurred after coverage terminated

Internal Denial: The above denial is related to eligibility and we need to categorize only the eligibility denial based on the Kareo plan. If we have the Kareo “Complete” plan, we should have checked the eligibility before submitting the claims. Then it falls in the Internal Denial category.

External Denial: If you don’t have the option to check eligibility within Kareo, then the denial falls in the External Denial category. We can stop these denials by changing to the Kareo “Complete” plan or by checking the providers’ websites and/or educating the front office to check eligibility.

Denials other than eligibility should be checked and sorted into Internal & External categories.

Using this denial summary, we need to categorize the denials as Internal & External denial by the top 20 denial codes. Based on the type of denial, we need to educate our team to reduce these denials. If most of the denials are related to Internal error, we need to provide guidance and education to the team to reduce such errors in the coming months.

For External denials, we need to co-ordinate with the coding team and provider office to stop the denials such as “denied as non-covered service,” “rendering provider is not eligible,” “Pt enrolled in Hospice.” etc. We need to educate the providers to document the medical records more specifically for the service rendered to avoid such denials.

Steps to be followed to reduce denial %:

  • Generate the Denial summary from year to date and convert into spreadsheet
  • Sort the denial by descending order by total billed amount
  • Categorize the External and Internal denials from the Top 20 denials
  • Identify the Root cause of the Denial
  • Create a good solution to reduce those denials one by one with the help of coding expert
  • Educate the team and provider office with the perfect solution for these denials
  • Next, you will see the denial percentage reducing drastically in the coming months

Denial Category Metric:

If a practice gets less than 5% of denials in the total monthly billed amount, then the practice is in the “Best” category. More than 5% denials should be monitored and need probe review to bring down the denials. The clean claim percentage can be increased by using the report effectively

Best Practice – Less than 5%

Average – Between 5 and 10%

Alarm Bells – Greater than 10%

Conclusion: Managing your denials = Improving your revenue cycle.

Henry Richards
EccoHealth LLC

This is the second month in a row that Henry has won—congratulations! But we’re throwing out the challenge to our many other fine billers, billing services and billing managers: Send your tips in, and you could win the $250 prize!

Please be sure to submit your Medical Billing Tip of the Month to Marketing@Kareo.com by Wednesday, September 26, for inclusion in the next round of judging. We’ll post the top three tips on our Facebook page and on the Kareo blog for your vote! You will win a $250 American Express gift card if your tip is chosen. Good luck!

Read More

Certifying EHR: Ways to Move Forward

Kathy McCoy, MBA September 6th, 2012

Leave a Comment Latest by COMMENTOR NAME

OIG found practices that were consistently submitting claims for higher-than-typical levels of E&M care also recently implemented EHR systems

This is part II in a series about an ongoing Office of Inspector General (OIG) investigation concerned with miscoded Medicare evaluation and management billing. In the first part, we introduced the problem and posed questions about related issues. Although resolution may be far off, as the OIG investigations continue, we think it may be reasonable to consider the steps ahead.

Investigation Background

Between 2001 and 2010, OIG auditors investigated thousands of physicians and their practices to determine why Medicare evaluation and management (E&M) billing seemed to be migrating into more expensive and more complex medical billing codes. OIG found 1,700 physicians and practices that were consistently submitting claims for higher-than-typical levels of E&M care. They also found that these same physicians and practices had also recently implemented electronic health records (EHR) systems. While it is important to remember that investigations are ongoing and no conclusions have been reached, it is becoming clear that there is a lot of work to do to make EHR products compliant with Medicare E&M documentation requirements.

If we were able to submit a “wish list” of industry and product changes, that list would include some or all of the following:

  1. Set Higher and More Consistent Standards — EHR vendors and the products they market must rise to meet a much higher standard of compliance for certification. Among the many changes required are significant design and function enhancements, audit protection for users, a capability to determine medical necessity and protection against over- and undercoding. Products that meet these CMS compliance standards should be certified as Medicare-compliant, and such certification should offer a degree of protection to users from investigation.
  2. Teach Compliance– Medical schools should use and teach on E&M documentation-compliant software. Physicians should be trained in the use of software that will facilitate efficient recording of relevant data and at the same time support compliant documentation requirements of Medicare E&M.
  3. CMS to Lead the Way – While CMS provides standards of compliance for others to follow, it must meet its own standards as it oversees the design, production and implementation of software vendors’ EHR products. CMS can integrate its compliance standards requirements into its existing EHR adoption incentives to encourage the use of compliant documentation products and at the same time prevent non-compliant designs from reaching the market.
  4. Shift the Focus from Physicians to EHR Software Vendors – The software engines that drive collection of E&M data are surprisingly consistent from product to product. OIG should refocus its enforcement attention on EHR vendors and those products that produce non-compliant E&M documentation. We would like to see CMS build audit protection into its certification standards so that products marketed to physicians can actually protect them from submitting flawed E&M documentation.

What is the big takeaway? It looks like physicians who have begrudgingly tolerated systems that forced them to simplify their E&M data collection into canned scripts and templates have been unfairly targeted. Yes, compliant documentation is ultimately the responsibility of the entity submitting the data, but until the smoking gun behind the miscoded E&M billing is located, we believe leniency is in order.

Read Part I of this series now.

Read More

Stop Denials in Their Tracks: Get Paid the First Time by Health Care Insurers, #2

Kathy McCoy, MBA August 23rd, 2012

Leave a Comment Latest by COMMENTOR NAME

Expert Betsy Nicoletti advised in this complimentary Kareo webinar that by setting up a process to measure, quantify and fix the reasons for denials, practices can significantly improve their collections and cash flow—and their bottom line.

There’s no denying it: Denials are the bane of every practice’s profit-and-loss statement. But the good news is: By setting up a process to measure, quantify and fix the reasons for denials, practices can significantly improve their collections and cash flow—and their bottom line.

That was the message during Betsy Nicoletti’s recent Kareo-sponsored webinar entitled Stop Denials in Their Tracks: Get Paid the First Time by Health Care Insurers. Betsy is a well-respected practice management and medical billing expert, as well as founder of Codapedia.com. During her webinar, she provided a blueprint for minimizing the number of denials on the claims you submit, so you can take back the dollars you are leaving in payers’ coffers. Our first blog on her webinar offered ways to track denials and the reasons for them, along with some of the more common pitfalls that trigger denials. This last blog on the webinar will recap Betsy’s strategies for getting claims clean and complete enough to pass even the most exacting claims scrutiny.

Betsy acknowledges that sometimes, it takes some detective work to determine the reason for denials. That is certainly the case with coding errors. A modifier might be added to the wrong CPT code, or modifier 59 may be added to a procedure that cannot be unbundled. Diagnostic tests may be denied because the provider failed to establish medical necessity by linking it to the correct diagnosis code. Or just as common, the test was performed more frequently than the payor allows. The solutions to coding errors are often found hidden in plain sight, in editorial comments of the CPT book. Betsy suggests you start there and read complete descriptions of codes along with the editorial comments. For complex coding issues, specialty societies can often provide information and supporting documentation and some will even field a few coding questions for free for their members.

Other errors are more easily prevented and rectified, such as misspelling the patient’s name or entering wrong demographic information; failing to verify insurance and benefits prior to the appointment; or authorization errors, such as not obtaining  pre-authorization or having the referral for services. Not filing claims on a timely basis can automatically trigger a denial, too. For all of these errors, Betsy recommends a “zero tolerance” policy that holds staff accountable for fulfilling the basics of claims submission.

Expert Betsy Nicoletti advised how to measure, manage and reduce denials in this complimentary Kareo webinar

Betsy strongly advises that medical billers fix claims before they are denied by checking clearinghouse reports daily. The reports will flag pre-adjudication errors so that they can be corrected before they are sent.  If your practice management system supports it, use technology to help you manage claims preparation and submission. Many systems can perform batch verification of eligibility or benefits, including patients’ deductible amounts, patient due amounts by benefit type, and more. Coding programs can check for bundling or diagnosis code congruence, if modifiers are allowed and if so, which ones. Take advantage of functionality such as claims estimators and electronic remittance advice and payments. To learn more about how Kareo’s powerful suite of tools helps streamlinine your medical billing and collections, visit Kareo.com

Finally, establish policies and procedures that set clear expectations for staff. They should include full registration at the time of the appointment; verification of eligibility and benefits; and authorizations prior to the appointment. Coding policies may include double-checking denials by another set of eyes before re-submitting them.

By tracking, measuring, researching and fixing the reasons for denials, practices can give themselves a much needed raise. To hear more on other practice management or medical billing issues that impact or enhance profitability, view our archived webinars to find more topics of interest to you. If you would like to be put on our notification list for upcoming informative webinars such as this one, sign up now.

Learn additional ways to improve your practice revenue: Register now for our next informational webinar, Finish Strong: Make 2012 Your Most Profitable Year! with widely respected consultant Karen Zupko.

Read More

Welcome to Getting Paid, a weblog by Kareo offering ideas, news and opinions about medical billing and practice management with the goal of making medical billing easier and yes, getting you paid. Visit the Product Blog for more information on our products.

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Enter your email address to receive "Getting Paid" as a monthly email newsletter.

Subscribe to RSS Feed

Follow Kareo

Find Kareo on LinkedIn Find Kareo on Facebook Find Kareo on Twitter Find Kareo on YouTube Find Kareo on Flickr

Web–Based Software by Kareo

Practice Management

Simplify the daily essential tasks of your medical office from patient records, to scheduling and more.

Electronic Medical Records

Improve patient care with electronic charting, electronic prescribing and medical labs interfaces.

Medical Billing & Collections

Streamline your entire medical billing and collections process from charge entry to reporting.

Clearinghouse Services

Integrated electronic claims, electronic remittance advice and insurance eligibility services.

Analytics & Data

Store and access data with insightful reports, document management and faxing, and an integration